By Melissa Harris-Perry on Melissa Harris-Perry

  • Casualties in the education wars

     - 

    AP Photo/M. Spencer Green

    Students gather outside Benjamin E. Mays Academy in Chicago for the first day of school Wednesday morning, after Chicago teachers voted to suspend their first strike in 25 years.

    Rolisa is a married mom with four kids. Two of them are successful graduates of Chicago’s public schools—her eldest graduated from college in 2011, and the second is a college junior. Her younger kids are in the fourth and sixth grades at a small public school on the South Side. The class sizes are at the city average, and the test scores are above the state average. Her kids are pretty happy there.

    Or at least they were, until the standoff between the Chicago Teachers Union and Mayor Rahm Emanuel transformed them into students of Rolisa’s makeshift kitchen table school.

    As the strike loomed, Rolisa secured a curriculum from her kids’ teachers, coordinated with other working parents and enlisted her eldest daughter. But even with this preparation, the strike was a harrowing time for her. Rolisa suffers from COPD, a serious breathing condition. As a result, she works from home, which made her impromptu home school possible but not easy. In addition to the exhausting days and the financial burden of hosting and feeding neighborhood kids every day, the uncertainty of when and how the strike would end kept everyone on edge. Rolisa worried about the dangers teens in her community might encounter during days of unstructured idleness. Like the majority of Chicago parents, she sided with the teachers, but she was frustrated and worried about her children’s short- and long-term prospects.

    "As a sixth grader, my son is facing very high-stakes testing this year," Rolisa told me. "We were hoping he could gain admission to one of the high school prep programs. That would give him access to the best public high schools. We needed every minute of class time before those tests. Every day they are out of school, he gets further from that prep program, further from the best high schools, further from college."

    Listening to Rolisa describe her son’s future in such precarious terms made me realize just how lucky I was to be born when I was—in the early 1970s. It was a moment when the civil rights and women’s movements opened new job opportunities for my parents. I started kindergarten when it was still the norm for all parents in the neighborhood—even those with more disposable income—to send their kids to the local public school. There was a private school in town, but I’m not sure who went there.

    It was the South, but this was just before white flight became a perfected strategy of resegregation, so I learned in racially and economically integrated classrooms. My teachers were paid a living wage, so they worked just one job, not two. They had time to offer extra help after school. In high school I had art, orchestra and sports—none of it cost extra. These were neighborhood schools, so I could walk or take a bus, and my single mom didn’t have to take time from work to get me to and from school and events. The schools weren’t great, but they were safe, and there were just enough extraordinary teachers to keep me challenged. Local businesses sponsored the football team, but no corporation sought profits from competing with our public schools.

    I ended up with a full scholarship to college, because universities still had affirmative action. I graduated into an expanding economy. I worked hard, but it’s obvious that the dumb luck of my birth year undoubtedly contributed to my professional and personal accomplishments.

    I’m not alone. As Brian Miller and Mike Lapham argue in The Self-Made Myth, successful people are only partly responsible for their accomplishments. Publicly financed infrastructure, property laws, favorable tax structures and social safety net programs are all crucial for entrepreneurs. In addition to these factors, personal accomplishment is also strikingly influenced by the random luck of when you’re born. Drawing on research from Malcolm Gladwell, Miller and Lapham report that "of the 75 richest people in all human history, 14 were Americans born between 1831 and 1840." When we are born determines whether we come of age in a recession or in an expanding economy, during peacetime or in the midst of a draft, at a moment when our identities limit our civil rights—or not.

    The conditions I faced as a schoolchild felt ancient, natural and permanent, but they were not. Widespread, integrated, quality public schools existed for only a brief moment. They were decimated by the original “school choice” movement—when middle-income white families fled cities for suburbs and public schools for private ones. School evaluations were once the subject of heated PTA meetings; now they come from remote bureaucrats who make demands from on high without providing adequate resources. As a nation we are paralyzed by the complexity of measuring achievement, and we’ve retreated to the blunt tool of high-stakes standardized tests.

    Which brings me back to Rolisa’s kids and their 350,000 peers. At press time, the Chicago Teachers Union voted to end the strike, tentatively agreeing to a new contract. Chicago’s children will soon be back in class—but the underlying issues are far from resolved. Reformers will continue to push for teacher evaluations based on student test scores; teachers will argue that such assessment tools must account for the poverty, dislocation, violence and incarceration that affect so many of the kids they teach. We can expect what happened in Chicago to repeat itself in other cities.

    We may eventually find our way through the fog of the school reform wars, but I’m worried that our solutions will come too late for too many. This generation of children may become hard-working, courageous adults who nonetheless are relegated to life sentences of poverty and underachievement. They are stuck because they were born in a time of war—not just the wars inAfghanistan and Iraq, not just the heavily armed wars in their own streets, but the wars between the leaders and teachers who are supposed to have their best interests at heart but who seem willing to allow this generation to be lost.

    Ed. note: This column was first published on The Nation last night. You can hear more from Melissa on education when she hosts the Education Nation Student Town Hall this Sunday at 10am ET on msnbc. Log on now to educationnation.com and see the video below to learn more, and to make yourself a part of the show. Last day to do so is today, so take action!

    Melissa Harris-Perry, msnbc Anchor and Tulane University Professor, hosts the first Education Nation Student Town Hall! You can make YOUR voice heard -- upload YOUR solution for how to fix education in America and it might be shown on TV during the Town Hall on msnbc.

  • 'The home that held our dreams'

     - 

    James Perry

    The Katrina-ravaged home recently purchased by the Perrys, devastated by Hurricane Isaac early this morning before they could revitalize it.

    Ed. note: Hurricane Isaac made landfall in New Orleans yesterday. Before it became a tropical storm once again, Isaac left hundreds of thousands flooded and without power. There will be more after a "deliberate breach" of one of the levees, ordered by Governor Bobby Jindal. We'll have more information on the blog later, but given the sad news today about the Katrina-ravaged home Melissa and her husband planned to revitalize and the many of you who have expressed concern, Melissa thought it best to respond to you about how she and her family are doing, and about the house. Her letter is below.

    I am incredibly moved by the outpouring of support I have received in the wake of Isaac. I want to be really sure that everyone understands that the home that was destroyed today is not the home where my family and I currently live.  My husband, daughter and I live in the 7th Ward of New Orleans is a traditional shotgun house that was damaged in Hurricane Katrina, but which we have fully restored.

    However, in the seven years since Katrina we have dealt with reality of a large, blighted house directly across the street from us. For several years we have been mired in the red tape of trying to purchase the home.  Less than a month ago we finally closed on it!  James, Parker and I have been excitedly planning for this home to be our dream home.  Work was scheduled to begin next week. In fact, we featured the house last Saturday on "Melissa Harris-Perry."

    This house was the home that held our dreams, but it did not yet hold our things.

    Early on the morning of Wednesday, August 29, exactly seven years after Katrina, the wind and rain of Hurricane Isaac leveled the house. No one was hurt. We are very sad about losing this house, but very grateful that we are all safe. Our loss does not compare the losses suffered in neighboring Plaquemines Parish. We do not want our loss to overshadow the far greater losses being suffered by our neighbors. 

    Your prayers, love and kindness mean so much.

    You can see the profile on the house below.

    MSNBC's Melissa Harris-Perry takes "Nerdland" on a tour around her home and neighborhood to share how New Orleans has changed since Hurricane Katrina.

     

  • On Katrina's anniversary, a bit of Homework

     - 

    We discussed today the continuing legacy of Hurricane Katrina, seven years after the catastrophic levee failure that devastated the city. I mentioned that Perspectives on Politics, a leading journal of the American Political Science Association, has devoted its most recent issue to research on post-Katrina New Orleans. It is an important scholarly collection, and I urge you to take the time to read some of the articles it contains.

    See you all again tomorrow in #nerdland.

    See our segments on Katrina's legacy below and after the jump, including Melissa's feature about rebuilding a New Orleans home ravaged by the disaster.

    MSNBC's Melissa Harris-Perry takes "Nerdland" on a tour around her home and neighborhood to share how New Orleans has changed since Hurricane Katrina.



    Seven years ago this coming week, Hurricane Katrina devastated the Mississippi Gulf Coast. Melissa Harris-Perry and her guests talk about the legacy of the national disaster, and the state of rebuilding New Orleans.

    Melissa Harris-Perry and her panelists analyze the political response to Hurricane Katrina, and its aftereffects.

  • The elephant in the womb

     - 

    The Buffalo News/Adam Zyglis

    Despite his seemingly robotic demeanor, Mitt Romney is proving himself a bit of a rogue. His campaign has broken the cardinal rule of presidential races: pander and pivot. First the candidate secures the base during the primaries by pandering to party ideologues; then the candidate swiftly pivots to the center to attract swing voters and independents. Eric Fehrnstrom’s infamous Etch A Sketch comment back in March suggested that Romney was preparing to execute this venerable campaign two-step. But the choice of Paul Ryan as running mate obliterates the possibility of moderation. This campaign is going to run hard and fast to the right. Forget the pivot; they’re just going to pander.

    Unlike Romney’s inconsistent but mostly centrist Massachusetts governing record, whose signature accomplishment was the model for the GOP-maligned “Obamacare,” Ryan’s ideological bona fides are unvarnished. And don’t be fooled: this is not about economics alone. Ryan is just as devoted to good old-fashioned moral conservatism, government small enough to fit on a vaginal probe. Ryan may have slipped his playbook into an Ayn Rand cover, but it was co-written by Ralph Reed.

    Nowhere is this more apparent, or more important, than in Ryan’s record on reproductive rights. Romney may have flippantly suggested that he would eliminate Planned Parenthood, but Ryan has worked consistently to restrict women’s access to healthcare. It’s not just his fifty-nine votes to block or limit reproductive rights that are of concern; it’s the absolutist nature of his positions. He rejects rape and incest as mitigating circumstances for abortion. He won’t even consider the possibility that women’s moral autonomy or constitutional rights are sufficient reasons for access.

    Ryan is one of sixty-four Congressional co-sponsors of H.R. 212, a “personhood” bill that gives legal rights to fertilized eggs. Last November a similar measure was soundly defeated by 57 percent of voters in that liberal bastion, Mississippi. (Mississippi!) Ryan co-sponsored a bill too extreme for a state that has only one abortion clinic, a state whose policies have effectively made it impossible for most doctors to perform—or for most women to access—an abortion.

    It may be time to update the title of Nina Simone’s iconic song from “Mississippi Goddam” to “Paul Ryan Goddam.”

    Ryan’s role in H.R. 212 isn’t just the symbolic co-sponsorship of a bill with little likelihood of passage. He explicitly articulated his case for personhood in a 2010 Heritage Foundation article, in which he parrots the familiar conservative case that America’s failure to recognize fetuses as persons is the same as our nation’s historical failure to recognize the humanity of enslaved black people. Therefore, Roe v. Wade is the twentieth-century equivalent of the 1857 Dred Scott decision.

    With Ryan and women’s health, there is no middle ground; there is only his moral judgment. And despite his avowed libertarianism on economic issues, on women’s health and rights Ryan is willing to use the full force of government to limit the freedom of dissenting citizens to exercise their opposing judgments.

    True, Ryan is merely running for vice president—and with the singular exception of Dick Cheney, vice presidents haven’t had much significant policy influence. But with the Ryan pick, Romney has signaled that his moderation on women’s health issues is over. He is casting his lot with the most extreme elements of the anti-choice movement. It should hardly be surprising, then, that within a week of the announcement, GOP Senate candidate Todd Akin told Fox News that he saw little reason to consider abortion in the case of rape or incest, because pregnancy rarely results from sexual assault. According to Akin, “If it’s legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down.” Romney and other Republicans swiftly denounced the remark, but it’s easy to see why a Ryan candidacy might have led Akin to believe that such a position would be acceptable.

    For more than a decade, GOP presidential candidates have pandered to pro-lifers but pivoted to a more moderate position in the general election. Now Romney is doing the opposite. This is, if nothing else, a fascinating political strategy. It forces the question: What’s the electoral arithmetic guiding Camp Romney? They seem to expect women swing voters to discount Ryan’s abysmal record.

    Perhaps they will, but after spending a half-hour on the StairMaster recently, I’m not so sure. Cardio machines are the one place I indulge my guilty pleasure of reading women’s magazines. I was startled to see a deeply personal letter in the September issue of Women’s Health from editor in chief Michele Promaulayko titled “Your Body Is a Battleground.” In it she recounts her own experience of receiving sexual health counseling and contraception from Planned Parenthood when she was 15. Promaulayko directs readers to an article by Gretchen Voss that urges: “Read on to learn how your choices are endangered and what you need to do to keep them from becoming extinct.” It’s a no-nonsense, well-researched, action-focused piece whose bottom line is that voting for someone with a record like Ryan’s is tantamount to voting against the health of women. And this is in a magazine whose other articles tell readers “How to Have a Flat Belly in 15 Minutes” and keeps them abreast of the “10 Hot Hair Color Trends.” A lefty political rag it is not.

    These women are interested in choice. And if choice appears in a magazine this mainstream, this close to the election, there’s good reason to think huge numbers of women will be prepared to demonstrate that at the polls. More than the breathless angst of progressive commentators, more than e-mail bombardments by feminist organizations, more than the slight panic in Romney’s tone as he reprimanded Akin, this article in Women’s Health has me convinced that by choosing Paul Ryan, Mitt Romney has ensured he will not be president of the United States.

    Melissa's column first appeared today in The Nation. Below is the recent Jason Stefaniak short film, "This is My Body," which you can learn more about here.

  • Why it matters that a woman moderates

     - 

    AP Photo/Edward M. Pio Roda, CNN

    CNN anchor Candy Crowley, who will soon be the first woman to moderate a presidential debate in the last 20 years.

    This is what debate moderation is all about and why we should care.

    The candidates must only respond to the questions that are posed to them, so the debate moderator has enormous power over the agenda-setting aspect. They help to determine whether or not any given set of issues rise to the level of national discourse in the context of a political campaign. Therefore, we want those moderators to be fair, to be smart, we want them to experienced, but we also want them to be diverse.

    We don’t want to assume that it’s only women’s responsibility to ask questions about women’s issues, because I hope that male moderators also will ask questions that specifically direct the candidates to respond to issues that women are concerned about.

    But Candy Crowley is a profoundly experienced journalist who has followed dozens of campaigns over her years as a journalist, and I expect that the kind of questions she’ll ask will have as much to do with her role as a political journalist rather than her role as a woman.

    I think it’s taken so long to get a female moderator because when people are in positions of privilege, they often just don’t notice who is not in the room. I may be in a room that’s very racially diverse, has men and women, but because I’m heterosexual I don’t notice that there’s no one in the room from the LGBT community to help address concerns of LGBT citizens. So I think part of it is that the world of political journalism has been such a boys club for so long that it’s probably less about active discrimination and more just sort of forgetting that women exist as part of our political world.

    Ed. note: This column originally appeared yesterday in Politico Arena. Today, Melissa interviewed the three young activists whose Change.org petition is credited with forcing this change. The video is below.

    CNN's Candy Crowley was named the first female moderator for a presidential debate in 20 years, and to celebrate, Melissa Harris-Perry invites her former "Foot Soldiers" - Emma Axelrod, Sammi Siegel, and Elena Tsemberis - to her panel to talk about their petition for more female representation at debates.


  • This week's Homework? Get your Gabby on

     - 

    AP Photo/Julie Jacobson

    Olympic gold medalist Gabby Douglas.

    #nerdland is back! As a result of the Romney-Ryan Republican Rollout -- or "RRRR" as I call it -- our show today was dominated with V.P. news.

    That said, I did want to take one moment to share one thought about the Olympics. During our time off, I spent a good deal of time riveted to the Olympics, and particularly to the spectacular performances of some of the black women athletes.  But two of those great performances were overshadowed by some commentator and social media absurdity.

    There was Serena Williams who became only the second woman in history to win a tennis Golden Slam -- titles in all four Grand Slam tournaments, plus an Olympic Gold medal in singles. As she achieved her victory she broke into a post-match celebratory dance, a dance known as the C-walk, created by the Crips gang in the 1970s.

    Among some commentators, the dance ended up getting more attention than the win. Listen, I don't support the glorification of gang violence, but I also don't support the unnecessary vilification of someone from Compton doing a dance that has cultural resonance for her that is vastly different meaning from its origins. I was disgusted to watch as some commentators allowed the dance to overshadow such an important career accomplishment, and such an important national win.

    But more than any other athlete, I couldn’t tear myself away from Gabrielle Douglas. This 16-year-old phenom had me screaming with joy and pride. I was so honored to interview Olympian Dominique Dawes on the show just two weeks before the Olympics. I asked her what she expected from our women’s team this year. Dawes predicted gold, and she was right! Even beyond her history-making performances, Gabby’s spectacular athleticism, grace and joyous self-possession were a shining light of these games.

    Which is why I could not believe it when some in social media, most of them other African American women, actually seemed more interested in denigrating her hair style than in cheering for her medals. (Not that she seemed to mind.) Dozens of smart commentators have already placed the hair angst in its historic, cultural, racial and gender context. One of my favorite Gabby blogs comes from Friend of #nerdland Dave Zirin:

    Anyone watching women’s gymnastics sees that many of the contestants look like hostages to screaming parents, rage-aholic coaches and their own unhappiness. Gabby Douglas actually looks happy to be there and through force of personality is congenitally unable to be invisible. This also has political repercussions, powerful enough that the largely sheltered 16-year-old seems to sense what she could mean.

    As she said to the New York Times in June, “I have an advantage because I’m the underdog and I’m black and no one thinks I’d ever win. Well, I’m going to inspire so many people. Everybody will be talking about, how did she come up so fast? But I’m ready to shine.” Shine she did.

    I thought of one other way we can honor Gabby and allow her to inspire us long after the closing ceremonies. Let’s strike a pose!

    After the death of Trayvon Martin, supporters donned hoodies in a sign of solidarity with the slain teen and with all the young men he represents.  Why don’t we take a page from that book -- but this time with the joy of one of young people?

    The next time you are feeling particularly accomplished, have finished something you started, achieved a goal you set, or are just feeling good about yourself.  Say to yourself, “I am Gabby Douglas.” Maybe even take the time to update your Facebook or your Twitter profile with yourself in your Gabby pose. And hey, sometimes you might even need to do a dance to celebrate you.

    Welcome back to #nerdland.

    MSNBC/Jamil Smith

    Allow Melissa to demonstrate the proper way to "get your Gabby on."

  • The #nerdland summer reading list

     - 

    Ed. note: This is Melissa's Footnote, as delivered on today's show and seen below. We've added links to the books she describes. Happy reading, #nerdland.

    Summer is the season of books. Life slows down just enough to make room for us to read something more than our Twitter feed.

    So for today's Footnote, this is my Summer Reading List, based on some of the topics we've covered during 2012.

    This election is all about the economy, but our conventional wisdom about economic downturns just might be wrong. Alexander Fields' "A Great Leap Forward: 1930s Depression and U.S. Economic Growth" offers a surprising argument that American productive capacity actually grew during the depression and laid the foundation for post war expansion.

    In #nerdland, we talk a lot about fairness and equality. Catch up on the long history of progressive political action with Michael Kazin's "American Dreamers: How the Left Changed a Nation."

    Let's be fair, there are some great conservative reads out there right now. My favorite at the moment is David Gelernter's "America-Lite: How Imperial Academia Dismantled Our Culture (and Ushered in the Obamacrats)." That title just kind of says it all doesn't it? Speaking of conservatives, at the end of the summer Mitt Romney is going to choose a running mate. If you think V.P. picks aren't interesting, just read "The 18-Day Running Mate: McGovern, Eagleton and a Campaign in Crisis." This is the story of an epic political fail, and it is fascinating.

    Did you love our black-hair segment and want to read more? We recommend "Hair Story: Untangling the Roots of Black Hair in America." Remember our discussion of First Ladies? Read about the most beloved in Hazel Rowley's "Franklin and Eleanor: An Extraordinary Marriage."

    #nerdland producers had some favorite picks: Kevin Smith's "Tough Sh*t: Life Advice for a Fat, Lazy, Slob who did Good" is a surprisingly fun, motivational and entreprenurial read.

    Need more inspiration? Especially in this sporting summer? Read "Road To Valor," the story of cyclist and Tour de France winner Gino Bartali, and how he secretly aided the Italian resistance to save Jews during World War II.

    Baratunde Thurston's "How to Be Black" has caused plenty of hilarity here in #nerdland while Isabel Wilkerson's "The Warmth of Other Suns" and Tayari Jones' "Leaving Atlanta" have evoked many tears.

    And just for fun we are reading Sadie Jones’ "Uninvited Guests." And I’m not going to tell you which us is addicted to the young-adult Delirium series. But after all when Maurice Sendak passed away, we made an argument for the importance of children's fiction.

    "Zeke Pippin," the young pig with a magical harmonica. The dragon-slaying "Paper Bag Princess" and the life-affirming "It's Okay to be Different" are #nerdland faves. And then there is Lloyd Alexander's "The First Two Lives of Lukas-Kasha," a book that one #nerdland producer remarked:

    "It made me believe storytelling is the world's greatest profession."

    Books change lives. Read one today.

    Footnote: Host Melissa Harris-Perry shares her list of suggested reads for the summer.

  • It's #nerdland -- of course there's homework

     - 

    For your homework this week, we have texts to help you delve into the topics we discussed in our Saturday and Sunday shows.

    Rather than letting a conservative super-PAC use Rev. Jeremiah Wright as a scare tactic, and the black church as a divisive tool, we decided to try to understand the theological tradition that Jeremiah Wright operates in as a thinker and preacher. Learn more by reading a book by our guest Dwight Hopkins, "Introducing Black Theology of Liberation."

    On Sunday, we gathered a compelling panel of young women. These young ladies will be voting in the 2012 election for the first time, and we wanted to know what was important to them. Learn more by reading "A Little F'd Up: Why Feminism is Not a Dirty Word," by one of our three amazing student guests, 19-year-old Barnard College student Julie Zeilinger.

    We also highlighted the compelling case of Clarence Aaron, a prisoner serving three life sentences who continues seeking a presidential commutation. Read the ProPublica report, written by our guest Dafna Linzer, which originally drew our attention -- as well as our blog post from earlier this week (which includes video from a 1999 PBS documentary that featured Aaron).

    We were also excited to discuss the NAACP's decision to support marriage equality today. Learn more about America's oldest and most influential Civil Rights organization by reading the definitive text by Patricia Sullivan, "Lift Every Voice: The NAACP and the Making of the Civil Rights Movement." And former Senator and presidential candidate Bill Bradley joined us to talk about his new book, "We Can All Do Better."

    Speaking of fascinating guests, remember that we'll be welcoming Margaret Cho back to #nerdland next weekend. See you then!

  • Happy birthday, Malcolm X

     - 

    Today is the birthday of Malcolm X. He would have been 87 years old.

    Malcolm rarely receives the kind of mainstream press attention that his better known counterpart, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. does. And perhaps that is best. Unlike King, Malcolm has been not been subjected to the ahistorical nostalgia machine of American hero-making. His radicalism remains intact.

    Let me be clear by what I mean when I say radicalism.

    I do not mean that Malcolm X sought to overthrow the American state. He did not. What he did seek was the undermining the structural inequality on which so many practices of the American state rested. At various points in his political career he advocated for separatism from a country he found irredeemably racist. He also evolved into a more nuanced thinker. He embraced a broad internationalism that sought to hold the United States accountable to world standards for human rights and free democracy.

    I do not mean that Malcolm X advocated violence. He did not. Malcolm was a staunch believer in the rights of citizens to defend themselves and their homes. He was, in some ways, a true second amendment theorist who believed that men, women and communities have a right to self-defense when their government fails to adequately protect their lives and families.

    I do not mean that Malcolm hated white people. He did not. He often used extreme rhetoric to make a point, to drive a conversation, to clarify his differences with other leaders, and to illuminate the painful realities of urban life and poverty.

    When I say "radical," I mean that Malcolm X was unflinching in his insistence on the inherent worth of black life. Malcolm criticized the powerful rather than the powerless. He pointed to the pathologies of the privileged instead of the failings of the oppressed. More than a decade into the 21st century, living in a nation where the majority of babies born today are not white, it is easy to forget just how radical it has been in America to insist on the humanity of black people. Public policy from slavery to Jim Crow to mass incarceration has denied the inherent humanity of black bodies, but Malcolm’s work was consistently on behalf of restoring it.

    And because he has been largely rejected by mainstream America, Malcolm’s radicalism has not been co-opted by conservative political movements. His words have not been turned into greeting cards. His image has not been used to sell consumer goods. Malcolm still belongs to those of us who find power and insight in his life and work.

    But this doesn’t mean Malcolm has been completely free from historical myth-making. In April of 2011, my dear friend and mentor Manning Marable passed away just days before his greatest and most anticipated work was published. Manning’s triumphant, and Pulitzer Prize-winning text, "Malcolm X: A Life of Reinvention," intervenes in the nostalgic image of Malcolm constructed by many of us in the post-civil rights generation.

    Those of us who met Malcolm through the prism of popular culture first embraced him as a commodity -- a movie hero, a hat with an "X" -- and embraced him a symbol of our own disenchantment with the crumbling American dream.

    Manning’s book challenges the commodity of Malcolm with a thorough, and sometimes uncomfortable, rendering of his life. He reminds us again of Malcolm’s extraordinary capacity for reinvention. Malcolm was born into poverty, madness and racial violence. His youthful arrogance, crime and indulgence led him to jail, but prison was no end for him; through a religious and political awakening, he found freedom in the context of imprisonment. He became an organization man, an orator, a world citizen and a free thinker with a cosmopolitan vision of the world.

    Malcolm displayed the capacity to learn, to grow, to discern and to change direction. It takes courage to admit that society’s approach to old subjects has grown rigid and needs to evolve and change. It is hard for leaders to admit that they have been wrong in the past.  His life is a reminder that greatness is not found in arrogant self-righteousness or intellectual hubris, but in the willingness to be open to our own limitations.

    As Malcolm’s definitive biographer, Manning Marable was more than an academic, he was an activist. It was Manning’s great wish that his biography would reopen the investigation of Malcolm’s assassination. While writing the book, Manning became convinced that we do not know the whole story. On Malcolm’s birthday, reintroduce yourself to him through Manning’s book. (You can watch a C-SPAN discussion of that book in which I took part here.)

  • Office Hours: Into the vault on marriage equality

     - 

    The New Yorker

    The New Yorker's next cover.

    This was a historic week in the battle for marriage equality in this country. The struggle is not over, but it has a powerful new ally. It got me to thinking about how many times I have written in defense of marriage equality and how many battles we have lost; like the Amendment 1 vote in North Carolina this week.

    On our show, we often enjoy going back "into the vault" to find historic moments that speak to our current news cycle. In that spirit, I went into my personal vault and found this piece I wrote for The Nation in October of 2009 in which I detailed the reasons I support marriage equality. In doing so, I was also struck by my reflection on pain of my own first marriage:

    I know from personal experience that a bad marriage is enough to rid you of the fear of death. But this experience allows me suspect that a good marriage must be among the most powerful, life-affirming, emotionally fulfilling experiences available to human beings. I support marriage equality not only because it is unfair, in a legal sense, to deny people the privileges of marriage based on their identity; but also because it also seems immoral to forbid some human beings from opting into this emotional experience.

    We must do more than simply integrate new groups into an old system. Let's use this moment to re-imagine marriage and marriage-free options for building families, rearing children, crafting communities, and distributing public goods.

    Since I first wrote this piece, I married my soul mate, moved to a new city, started a new academic job, and begun hosting this show. Huge changes! Yet, so much of what I wrote in that column about the inequality facing loving LGBT couples hasn't changed at all. I hope to look back someday very soon, and remember this week as the beginning of the end of second-class citizenship for so many of the people I love.

  • Our Sunday homework is on pointe

     - 

    We were truly thrilled to have the gracious and graceful Misty Copeland in #nerdland today, leaving us all dreaming of being ballet dancers.  Your first homework assignment is to get Kristen Hall and Anne Kennedy’s "Ballerina Girl," and read it to a child -- whether they be your own, a niece, a neighbor, or kids at a local school, girl or boy.

    Daniel Gross lit up #nerdland with his claim that America is actually better off today than in the past two decades. Read his provocative piece, "Myth Of Decline: U.S. Is Stronger and Faster Than Anywhere Else" and his similarly-themed new book, "Better, Stronger, Faster: The Myth of American Decline...and the Rise of a New Economy."

    We highlighted the case of Florida mother Marissa Alexander, who faces 20 years in prison for (it seems) firing a bullet into the ceiling to stop an attack from her abusive husband. That led to a discussion about the laws affecting domestic violence survivors when they finally try to stand their ground. To learn more about the complex and difficult issues of violence and the law, read Sokoloff and Pratt’s edited volume,  "Domestic Violence at the Margins: Readings on Race, Class, Gender, and Culture," and Silja Talvi’s heartbreaking stories in "Women Behind Bars: The Crisis of Women in the U.S. Prison System."

    For my footnote I mounted a defense of race and ethnic studies programs.  Read more about the complex history of these programs in Noliwe Rooks’ "White Money/Black Power: The Surprising History of African American Studies and the Crisis of Race and Higher Education."

    And of course, don’t forget to visit "MHP" guest Kathleen Hall Jamieson’s new project, FlackCheck.org, a website that by its own description,

    ...uses parody and humor to debunk false political advertising, poke fun at extreme language, and hold the media accountable for their reporting on political campaigns.

    Check out the site, and get your truth on! Happy reading, and I'll see you next week.

  • Some rather presidential homework this Saturday

     - 

    We kicked off our conversation this morning by asking about the importance –- or irrelevance -- of foreign policy accomplishments for presidential candidates. We used the political science metaphor of “waltzing before a blind audience.”  To learn more about this theory and the challenges to it, read Aldrich, Sullivan and Borgida’s classic 1989 piece, “Foreign Affairs and Issue Voting: Do Presidential Candidates "Waltz Before A Blind Audience?” from The American Political Science Review.

    We had an extended conversation about the difficulty and the promise of building lasting strategic coalitions among African American civil rights organizations and LGBT rights organizations. For an insightful and exquisitely researched take on how difficult and important this issue really is, read Cathy Cohen's "The Boundaries of Blackness: AIDS and the Breakdown of Black Politics." During this conversation, I mentioned Bayard Rustin, architect of the March on Washington. Read his collected writings in "A Time on Two Crosses."

    It was terrific to share the table with the University of Pennsylvania's Kathleen Hall Jamieson today -- so terrific that she’s coming back tomorrow! Jamieson is the co-author of "The Obama Victory: How Media, Money, and Message Shaped the 2008 Election,” a must-read as we prepare for the 2012 elections.

    Finally, we really did have fun theorizing about the lessons of love and politics that can be gleaned from President Obama’s youthful missives. But there is no better way to get to know the man who is the president than to read his autobiography, "Dreams from My Father: A Story of Race and Inheritance."

    Don’t forget to tune in tomorrow, when we'll welcome groundbreaking ballerina Misty Copeland to #nerdland! Happy reading!

Weekends, 10am-12pm ET, msnbc
"Melissa Harris-Perry" is hosted by the Tulane political science professor of the same name. Join her each Saturday and Sunday as she explores politics, culture, art and community beyond the beltway. A panel and guest-driven conversation featuring penetrating political analysis and humor, "MHP" continuously challenges the definition of politics and will push the boundaries of what we know, how we know it, and where we get our information. Twitter: @MHPshow.
Recent tweets
5210,4