
AP Photo/M. Spencer Green
Students gather outside Benjamin E. Mays Academy in Chicago for the first day of school Wednesday morning, after Chicago teachers voted to suspend their first strike in 25 years.
Rolisa is a married mom with four kids. Two of them are successful graduates of Chicago’s public schools—her eldest graduated from college in 2011, and the second is a college junior. Her younger kids are in the fourth and sixth grades at a small public school on the South Side. The class sizes are at the city average, and the test scores are above the state average. Her kids are pretty happy there.
Or at least they were, until the standoff between the Chicago Teachers Union and Mayor Rahm Emanuel transformed them into students of Rolisa’s makeshift kitchen table school.
As the strike loomed, Rolisa secured a curriculum from her kids’ teachers, coordinated with other working parents and enlisted her eldest daughter. But even with this preparation, the strike was a harrowing time for her. Rolisa suffers from COPD, a serious breathing condition. As a result, she works from home, which made her impromptu home school possible but not easy. In addition to the exhausting days and the financial burden of hosting and feeding neighborhood kids every day, the uncertainty of when and how the strike would end kept everyone on edge. Rolisa worried about the dangers teens in her community might encounter during days of unstructured idleness. Like the majority of Chicago parents, she sided with the teachers, but she was frustrated and worried about her children’s short- and long-term prospects.
"As a sixth grader, my son is facing very high-stakes testing this year," Rolisa told me. "We were hoping he could gain admission to one of the high school prep programs. That would give him access to the best public high schools. We needed every minute of class time before those tests. Every day they are out of school, he gets further from that prep program, further from the best high schools, further from college."
Listening to Rolisa describe her son’s future in such precarious terms made me realize just how lucky I was to be born when I was—in the early 1970s. It was a moment when the civil rights and women’s movements opened new job opportunities for my parents. I started kindergarten when it was still the norm for all parents in the neighborhood—even those with more disposable income—to send their kids to the local public school. There was a private school in town, but I’m not sure who went there.
It was the South, but this was just before white flight became a perfected strategy of resegregation, so I learned in racially and economically integrated classrooms. My teachers were paid a living wage, so they worked just one job, not two. They had time to offer extra help after school. In high school I had art, orchestra and sports—none of it cost extra. These were neighborhood schools, so I could walk or take a bus, and my single mom didn’t have to take time from work to get me to and from school and events. The schools weren’t great, but they were safe, and there were just enough extraordinary teachers to keep me challenged. Local businesses sponsored the football team, but no corporation sought profits from competing with our public schools.
I ended up with a full scholarship to college, because universities still had affirmative action. I graduated into an expanding economy. I worked hard, but it’s obvious that the dumb luck of my birth year undoubtedly contributed to my professional and personal accomplishments.
I’m not alone. As Brian Miller and Mike Lapham argue in The Self-Made Myth, successful people are only partly responsible for their accomplishments. Publicly financed infrastructure, property laws, favorable tax structures and social safety net programs are all crucial for entrepreneurs. In addition to these factors, personal accomplishment is also strikingly influenced by the random luck of when you’re born. Drawing on research from Malcolm Gladwell, Miller and Lapham report that "of the 75 richest people in all human history, 14 were Americans born between 1831 and 1840." When we are born determines whether we come of age in a recession or in an expanding economy, during peacetime or in the midst of a draft, at a moment when our identities limit our civil rights—or not.
The conditions I faced as a schoolchild felt ancient, natural and permanent, but they were not. Widespread, integrated, quality public schools existed for only a brief moment. They were decimated by the original “school choice” movement—when middle-income white families fled cities for suburbs and public schools for private ones. School evaluations were once the subject of heated PTA meetings; now they come from remote bureaucrats who make demands from on high without providing adequate resources. As a nation we are paralyzed by the complexity of measuring achievement, and we’ve retreated to the blunt tool of high-stakes standardized tests.
Which brings me back to Rolisa’s kids and their 350,000 peers. At press time, the Chicago Teachers Union voted to end the strike, tentatively agreeing to a new contract. Chicago’s children will soon be back in class—but the underlying issues are far from resolved. Reformers will continue to push for teacher evaluations based on student test scores; teachers will argue that such assessment tools must account for the poverty, dislocation, violence and incarceration that affect so many of the kids they teach. We can expect what happened in Chicago to repeat itself in other cities.
We may eventually find our way through the fog of the school reform wars, but I’m worried that our solutions will come too late for too many. This generation of children may become hard-working, courageous adults who nonetheless are relegated to life sentences of poverty and underachievement. They are stuck because they were born in a time of war—not just the wars inAfghanistan and Iraq, not just the heavily armed wars in their own streets, but the wars between the leaders and teachers who are supposed to have their best interests at heart but who seem willing to allow this generation to be lost.
Ed. note: This column was first published on The Nation last night. You can hear more from Melissa on education when she hosts the Education Nation Student Town Hall this Sunday at 10am ET on msnbc. Log on now to educationnation.com and see the video below to learn more, and to make yourself a part of the show. Last day to do so is today, so take action!
Melissa Harris-Perry, msnbc Anchor and Tulane University Professor, hosts the first Education Nation Student Town Hall! You can make YOUR voice heard -- upload YOUR solution for how to fix education in America and it might be shown on TV during the Town Hall on msnbc.


Ms. Perry,
Last week I attended (virtually) the Dell sponsored MIT event and the event that followed that you hosted. Both were excellent. Its my understanding you are hosting a "Student Town Hall" this week. During the roundtable event there was one student from Maryland (I believe his name is Zak) who seemed to resonate throughout the entire panel.
I'm writing to see if he is scheduled to be involved in this weekend's broadcast? For an individual of such a young age his purpose, focus, and ability to articulate student issues were beyond his years.
Thanks!
Respectfully,
Ed Schlesinger
emschlesinger@studentforce.com
studentforce.com LLC
www.studentforce.com
I am a member of the 47% Romney was talking about, but I understood exactly what he meant and don't try to bend his words out of shape like liberals do , in other words lie. I know that Romney had no intention to call the working class slackers or the seniors and that's good enough for me...after all the democrats are the party of the poor and they own them...they get their votes and Romney told the truth...
My 3 children went to public school and did a fabulous job. These schools were in the inner city because I chose to bus them into the inner city as many white parents were busing their children to the suburbs. What I never figured out and still cannot is how come monies are not provided to inner city schools to improve them, but monies go to charter schools. When I volunteered in both the inner city schools and the suburban school it was obvious the difference between the two was stark. Inner city schools - drab and gray with no art on the walls and suburban schools with art on the wall, wonderful sounds of music coming from different rooms, fine lighting, etc.
For me personally, I received a bachelor degree in 1980 after my children started school. I went back to school in 1995, received a bachelors and a masters degree and stand at ABD now. But, I am $140,000 in school debt.
In the long run, I think my children came out better even though they had college debt, compared to me who is in over my head (I am 61). They went to inner city public schools and I still can't figure out the veracity of charter schools. They leave so many behind.
Our children DO NOT belong to you. To fix the education system we need to get the federal government out of it. Encourage home schooling and more community based schools as recommended recently by a Harvard professor, sorry can't remember his name but it was a great idea. A throw back to the one room schools where the older kids helped the younger and there would be less tendency for bullying.