
politify.com
Taxes are on everyone's minds these days, it seems, as Republicans and Democrats duke it out: Where are Mitt Romney's tax returns? Is the individual mandate a tax? What's going on with the Bush Tax Cuts?
The website Politify breaks down the real question we should be asking when it comes to the tax debate: whose tax plan would benefit me? Politify describes itself as "a platform that provides Americans with data-backed financial projections of political scenarios."
Essentially, the minds behind the site -- a team of UC Berkeley students -- have collected relevant data through the U.S. Census and IRS, parsed through it, and created an easy-to-use tool to help answer the question "What candidate best serves our individual interests?"
Politify is broken down into three sections:
- The personal tab lets individual users enter their own information—age, income, number of dependents—and see which candidate's tax plan would have the greatest affect on the user's income.
- The local part of the site contains an interactive color-coded map that shows whose tax plan benefits what areas in the country.
- The national section shows an overall breakdown of Obama's and Romney's plans, and how each would affect the national deficit and average households across the country.
The "local" map is the most interesting part of the whole project. If you zoom out to view the whole country, you'll see an overwhelming amount of blue (for Obama). The orange areas, which represents areas that benefit from Romney's plan, are sparse and spread out. You can also click on specific cities and see a comparison by percentage of whose plan benefits the residents.
The most noticeable orange splotch on the map is up in Alaska: according to the data, 91 percent of Fairbanks and 85 percent of Anchorage would benefit from Romney's tax plan.
So whose tax plan would benefit you? You may be surprised (most of Manhattan would benefit from Romney's plan), or maybe it'll be just what you expect.


Is racism really learned?
I know this sounds like an extremists question. I am not qualified to answer this question. All of the racism I see looks like a very visceral/organic thing. It makes ME ask this question, I don't know about anyone else. But, I do think that the answer to this question would help give a better strategy of how to navigate this world.
There may be inherent predispositions in humankind to racism and, more broadly, xenophobia. It may be argued that our ancestors benefited from distrust of other tribes. But humans are now faced with a need to rework intentionally traits which may have been "selected," in the Darwinian sense (certainly cultural, maybe genetic), but which no longer serve. In an unprecedented era of finite, dwindling resources and an impending global catastrophe, it is now incumbent upon the human race to abandon competition in favor of cooperation, to replace paranoia with empathy. This will require leadership in political, educational, philosophical and spiritual spheres. In 2008, Obama seemed to hint at an understanding of these imperatives, but the burden of governance has overwhelmed that vision with a jagged scrim of realpolitik. In the current presidential election, we are squabbling at the fringes of a profound question of consciousness.