
AP Photo/Gerald Herbert
Rev. Fred Luter reacts after his election as president of the 167-year-old Southern Baptist Convention.
Yesterday, the Southern Baptist Convention (SBC), America's largest Protestant denomination, elected their new president unopposed. This is not a typical news lede; heck, for a lot of folks, it barely qualifies as news. But it happens to be news, and not just because the man they elected to lead them is one of color:
Fred Luter, a New Orleans pastor and civic leader, ran unopposed for the top post in the 167-year-old Southern Baptist Convention, which counts a growing number of minorities among its 16 million members.
His election to a one-year term was met by thunderous applause and a standing ovation from the 7,000 Southern Baptists attending the convention's annual meeting in New Orleans.
Luter, 55, was born and raised in the city, which is also home to the church he rebuilt into the denomination's largest congregation in Louisiana after Hurricane Katrina devastated it in 2005.
You might think that the most surprising and newsworthy part of the above excerpt is the fact that Rev. Fred Luter is African American. Yes, that's news, a barrier broken, cheered by thousands. It's a big deal. It's only been 17 years since the SBC apologized to Luter, me, and other African Americans for literally having come into creation to protect the institution of slavery. All well and good, right? Well, the Southern Baptists weren't done signifying.
They made another symbolic move today, albeit one that came with considerably more hesitance. Turns out the Southern Baptists are no longer called by that name. They're now Great Commission Baptists, after the convention voted with a 53% majority to change the brand name so as not to turn off those alienated by the word "Southern":
“In regions outside of the South, ‘Southern’ may conjure up a regional stereotype that becomes a hindrance to the Gospel,” Roger S. "Sing" Oldham, a spokesman for the denomination, told the Los Angeles Times. “Our brothers and sisters in Christ who are of other race and language groups can now identify themselves with something that does not hearken back to a Southern past.” ...
The term "Great Commission" refers to Jesus's command to his apostles to go forth and make disciples of all nations.
Sounds like progress, right? Even progressive, perhaps? Perhaps, at least in terms of branding and symbolism. But the convention also took another vote today, adopting a resolution against marriage equality, among other things. This wasn't the same as voting on rights in a state election, per se; they just wanted to make it clear that they're opposed to same-sex marriage and for restrictions on all manner of intimate behavior:
Thousands of delegates at the denomination's annual meeting in New Orleans on Wednesday were nearly unanimous in their support for the resolution that affirms their belief that marriage is "the exclusive union of one man and one woman" and that "all sexual behavior outside of marriage is sinful." ...
"It is regrettable that homosexual rights activists and those who are promoting the recognition of 'same-sex marriage' have misappropriated the rhetoric of the Civil Rights Movement," the resolution states.
I'm a Christian, and a member of another denomination that doesn't recognize same-sex marriage, or gay clergy. I cast no stones from any glass house here, but what I see in this news is a maintenance of old practices, newly branded for the 21st century. The Southern Great Commission Baptists may not be what they once were, and they may have changed significantly over this past weekend. But what I see in this news today is a denomination that seeks to merely slap a different label on itself, but continue with an old practice.
They'd be wise to heed James 3:18 -- "Peacemakers who sow in peace reap a harvest of righteousness." I'm unsure how a resolution infringing upon the freedoms and dignity of a selected group of people is in any way peaceful, or righteous.


I agree with you Melissa. Religious practices don't seem to live up to our expectations.
I was raised a Catholic, but now am a proud member of the Unitarian Universalists. We do not accept that some of us are less equal than others. Dr. King once quoted a Unitarian abolitionist minister in one of his speeches... "I do not pretend to understand the moral universe; the arc is a long one, my eye reaches but little ways; I cannot calculate the curve and complete the figure by the experience of sight; I can divine it by conscience. And from what I see I am sure it bends towards justice." -- Theodore Parker. If ever you feel that your church is not truly embracing the message that Dr. King gave in his "I Have a Dream" speech - "Now is the time to make justice a reality for all of God's children" - then you may want to spend a Sunday at a UU congregation to see what it feels like to stand on the side of love. - in peace - Jim Lyons
Ever wonder why so many are so intolerant of gays in general, I know the Bible told them so but I think its time to challenge the Bible that discriminates against anyone as being less than or my favorite an abomination,hell bound etc. Ever wonder how in the Sodemn and Gomorrah days that anyone could actually harm an angel in the first place and why did this partiular Angel need protection..never made since to me, its just time to challenge old out dated beliefs because of the damage it has caused our societies and other Nations, from Wars to passing laws that suppress...its interesting how slavery is not ok but modern day slavery comes in a different form but when you suppress or murder and even take away rights of a minority by a vote is no better than slavery. I understand because one believes God doesn't love Gays but is that true? How many version of the Bible to we have? Translations and then there is the time periods of what was acceptable back in the day and was changed as societies changed. If we would take a closer look at why this is and it is fact that history has shown we have become more tolerant in some areas but not in others means we can be in all areas if we choose too. If we could challenge this forever insanity in ones thinking maybe we could finally open up the door for true tolerance. I know this would take some research of texts that has been hidden but is coming to the surface but it is coming soon! My only concern is that with such beliefs that are so well rooted in the ego, it can cause a fire of violence and this should not be so. I believe there is a way where we can find peaceful means to share our beliefs without war by undoing false assumptions and premises of our beliefs and then see how shallow those beliefs are. Many will fight it but millions will embrace it, I believe people are more ready for change and peace is the way.